Monday, August 10, 2009

City/CUPE Strike: The Historical Context


I think it is too early to tell who won or lost. We have not yet begun to understand what was really going on.

As I suggested with respect to Gord's damage control comment about Eddie and Toronto's David Miller, after the Protocol fiasco I suspect that formerly friendly politicians may well be trying to distance themselves from our Eddie. Great planner, poor in execution, rattled under fire.

So much for pancakes and best wishes:
  • "Toronto's waste collectors piling up the overtime

    Mayor David Miller said city staff were directed to ensure that no overtime would be collected after the strike except for cleanup and matters of health and safety.

    “We've got to get the garbage cleaned up. That's the first priority,” Mr. Miller said. “When you're picking up from many houses in Toronto, mine included, six weeks worth of recycling and six weeks worth of garbage – it takes time.”

    Asked why Toronto didn't follow the lead of Windsor, which prohibited overtime during its garbage cleanup after a 101-day strike, Mr. Miller was curt. “Why not leave garbage in the streets for another few weeks? I think the question speaks for itself.”

It's a shame though that David did not tell the Toronto media to read the Windsor Star to see what the real garbage situation in Windsor is! 75-80% dealt with...pshaaaaaw!

Who knows, perhaps Councillor Halberstadt's son who "is taking a course in local history at the U this summer and is working off a book chronologizing the 99-day Ford strike in 1945" could ask his Prof to write an essay and put this strike into a historical context for us.

In any event, we will certainly find out over time what happened. In the meantime, a reader sent me this note that is being circulated that is obviously pro-CUPE and gives the author's perspective of what happened.

  • YOU HELD THE LINE

    An Open Letter to leadership and membership of
    CUPE Local 82 and CUPE Local 543

    You held the line.

    You held the line and by doing so it was a victory for every person in this city who must sell his or her labour for a wage and salary in order to survive, be they union or non-union.

    Ninety years ago, in the city of Winnipeg, thousands of government workers, municipal employees and workers in private industry, men and women, proclaimed a General Strike. In a strike lasting 100 days they battled for elemental rights. While that strike was defeated by the combined assault of political leaders, employers and strikebreakers egged on by the press it became a symbol to spur on workers for the rights of free collective bargaining.

    The 99 day Windsor Ford strike in 1945 was another momentous event when autoworkers in our community stood against the employer, the forces of an anti-union corporation and two levels of government abetted by the anti-union outpourings of the local press. Forced to end the strike, the ruling of what came to be known as the Rand Formula helped to finally establish the process of free collective bargaining, union security and the legitimisation of trade unionism. Those rights have come under increasing attack as they did in these past many weeks.

    History happened in Windsor this summer.

    This was more than a strike about a particular set of demands and needs of a section of Windsor’s working people and of two union locals holding onto hard won economic gains in a time of general economic downturn.

    In this strike 1,800 Windsor CUPE workers placed themselves on the front line to defend the very process of free collective bargaining, those very rights the Canadian working class struggled so hard to win for 150 years. And that is precisely why you encountered the particular intransigence of a mayor, why some councilors slavishly towed the line or remained in silence.

    The agenda of the mayor and city council was never articulated beyond shallow references that retrograde battle cry of “fiscal responsibility,” a smokescreen to keep the public in the dark and to provide self-justification for turning their backs on you. The job of articulating that message and perspective was left to certain members of the media who attacked the union as they always have with such particular vehemence to a captive but increasingly dwindling audience.

    The more it became clear that you stood together in union and could not be cowed the more they shrieked about greedy workers stealing money from the public fund, the more they preyed upon ignorance and fear. And it is particularly easy in tough economic times to stir up the pot of suspicion, distrust and mean heartedness to turn neighbour against neighbour. Ultimately they failed.

    Their so-called “taxpayer revolt” did not exist beyond those individuals who gave in to fear and ignorance. The real revolt was organised and it was the revolt of thousands against the position of the mayor and city councilors. The mayor and councilors and their pundits will never admit to this or acknowledge it. It is to their political detriment to admit it ever existed because it exposed the lie that the city administration spoke on behalf of the community.

    The mayor and councilors should take heed that even after the dust of the strike settles (and it will not settle for a long, long time), that their role will come back to haunt them.

    Strikes are momentous life changing experiences. The strike you fought, with a new leadership that underwent trial by fire, and fought for so long at such great personal cost has many lessons each member can take away with them. It revealed to the broad community who you were, what you represented, the principles you upheld, and who was out there with you.

    Members of CUPE Local 82 and CUPE Local 543 can be proud of what you have
    accomplished and what you have inspired others to do.

    What the city workers did was amazing because you held the line for all of us.

    With much thanks.

The Three Amigos And The DRIC bridge


Not a word! Here is what they said that was border related

As you read on, all one can say is Poor Stephen! Quick, call for the Governor General to help out!

JOINT STATEMENT BY NORTH AMERICAN LEADERS

Guadalajara, August 2009
  • "Our integrated economies are an engine of growth. We are investing in border infrastructure, including advanced technology, to create truly modern borders to facilitate trade and the smooth operation of supply chains, while protecting our security. Building on these investments, we will work together to strengthen the resilience of our critical infrastructure, which transcends borders and sustains the well-being of our communities and economies. We will cooperate in the protection of intellectual property rights to facilitate the development of innovative economies. We commend the progress achieved on reducing unnecessary regulatory differences and have instructed our respective Ministers to continue this work by building on the previous efforts, developing focused priorities and a specific timeline.

    North American trade is a vital component of our economic well-being and we pledge to abide by our international responsibilities and avoid protectionist measures. We reiterate our commitment to reinvigorate our trading relationship and to ensure that the benefits of our economic relationship are widely shared and sustainable. We will seek to promote respect for labour rights and protection of the environment with a continuing dialogue to address the functioning of the Labor and Environmental side agreements. This dialogue must result in mutually agreeable and cooperative activities with the aim to enhance the well-being and prosperity of our citizens and the economic recovery of our countries."

It seems to me that the language hardly supports spending billions on a DRIC project especially when the specific item mentioned to help out was "advanced technology."

I would argue that in fact the language supports the Bridge Company's Enhancement Project where they risk their own money:

  • "we will work together to strengthen the resilience of our critical infrastructure."

That sounds to me like working to fix up the existing bridge at its location since its smooth operation is critical to both economies!

Want to know how badly Canada lost out thanks to NAFTA-gate. Here are the other Statements released as set out on the White House website.:

STATEMENTS AND RELEASES---nothing about a DRIC Bridge here either


8/10/2009
North American Leaders Summit: Energy Deliverables
Energy and climate change will be an important element of the trilateral discussions at the North American Leaders Summit, to be held in Guadalajara, Mexico, on August 9-10, 2009.



8/10/2009
North American Leaders' Declaration on Climate Change and Clean Energy
We, the leaders of North American reaffirm the urgency and necessity of taking aggressive action on climate change.



8/10/2009
North American Leaders' Declaration on H1N1
Building on the strong record of our trilateral cooperation during the spring of this year, we will remain vigilant and pledge to continue our close collaboration in addressing the H1N1 pandemic. We agree to work together to ensure that we have effective strategies, grounded in the best available science.

And from the PRESS GAGGLE BY DEPUTY PRESS SECRETARY BILL BURTON Aboard Air Force One

  • "Q Does he have any new initiatives that he plans to put on the table here, or is this a follow-up to the meetings that he had with Calderón and Harper earlier this year?

    MR. BURTON: Well, I would point out that the President has made it a point to focus in on issues important to this hemisphere, and together with his counterparts in Canada and Mexico -- he's met with those leaders a combined dozen times. So this is one part of an ongoing discussion to talk about some of the things that are specifically time-sensitive, as I mentioned before, and it's a conversation that will keep going.

    Obviously President [sic] Harper will be coming to Washington in September. We'll see them at the G20. So this is part of an ongoing conversation."

PRESS BRIEFING BYNATIONAL SECURITY ADVISOR GENERAL JAMES JONES,DEPUTY NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISOR FORINTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC AFFAIRS MICHAEL FROMAN,NSC SENIOR DIRECTOR OF WESTERN HEMISPHERE AFFAIRSDANIEL RESTREPO,AND DEPUTY NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISOR FORCOUNTERTERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY JOHN BRENNAN


  • "In terms of the schedule, the first meeting on the trip will be with President Calderón and his team. This will be the President's third meeting with President Calderón this year, once as President-elect and twice as President. This underscores the importance the President places on our relationship with Mexico, and his support for the courageous efforts of President Calderón and Mexico in confronting violent drug cartels.

    Given the depth and breadth of our relationship with Mexico, the bilateral meeting with President Calderón and his team will undoubtedly touch on a broad range of issues from security cooperation to preparation for the coming North American flu season, to economic partnership, to clean energy and climate change, to name a few examples"

No nice words about Stephen!

Protectionism: Will Obama Listen


The Star reported that he said:

  • "Buy American won't compromise trade: Obama

    President Barack Obama downplayed his country's controversial Buy American policy on Monday and said it has not compromised trade relations between Canada and the United States.

    Speaking at a joint news conference with Prime Minister Stephen Harper and Mexican President Felipe Calderon following a two-day North American summit in Guadalajara, Obama said Harper raised the issue with him.

    "It's important to keep it in perspective that, in fact, we have not seen some sweeping steps towards protectionism," Obama said, adding that the measure does not contravene any World Trade Organization obligations.

    The provision requires U.S. contractors to use raw materials and equipment made in the U. S. for projects tied to the $787-billion U.S. stimulus package. Harper and his cabinet colleagues, including Foreign Affairs Minister Lawrence Cannon in a meeting with U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in June, have been calling for a reversal of the provisions and, last week, the provincial and territorial premiers voiced their support for Ottawa's efforts to push back against the policy. Canadian companies say they are losing millions of dollars in contracts because of the Buy American provision..."

    Harper, who arrived in Mexico on Sunday for two days of talks with Calderon and Obama — an annual meeting dubbed the Three Amigos Summit — made it clear he doesn't intend to drop the issue.

    "I anticipate that President Obama and I will be discussing this at greater length at our upcoming meetings," Harper said at the news conference. Harper and Obama have a bilateral meeting scheduled in Washington in September."

Such nice words from the President in Mexico. Here is a different US reality that blames the mess on us and suggests that no one in DC really cares what Harper thinks!

  • THE WHITE HOUSE

    Office of the Press Secretary
    For Immediate Release
    August 7, 2009

    PRESS BRIEFING BY
    NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISOR GENERAL JAMES JONES,
    DEPUTY NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISOR FOR INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC AFFAIRS MICHAEL FROMAN,
    NSC SENIOR DIRECTOR OF WESTERN HEMISPHERE AFFAIRS DANIEL RESTREPO,
    AND DEPUTY NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISOR FOR COUNTERTERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY JOHN BRENNAN

    August 6, 2009

    James S. Brady Press Briefing Room

    Q I guess maybe Mr. Froman -- it's the "Buy America." Both Canada and Mexico, Canada especially, are upset over -- continue to be upset over the "Buy America" provisions. We have heard here in the briefing room that that's really been resolved, that we would adhere to our international obligations. Yet Canada says that there is a violation. Can you resolve that? And how will it be resolved this weekend?

    MR. FROMAN: As you know, the President insisted that whatever "Buy American" provisions were put into the stimulus bill be consistent with our international obligations, and we believe the implementation of the "Buy American" provisions are consistent with our international obligations. The problem, as you probably know, is that Canada has not bound its provinces to the government procurement agreement and therefore our states are not bound either. And so it covers federal procurement, but not state and local procurement.

    We're in dialogue with Canada and our other trading partners about the issue to try and implement the "Buy American" provision in a way consistent with the law, consistent with our international obligations, while minimizing disruption to trade.

    Q Does the fact that the provinces aren't bound, is that a violation of WTO --

    MR. FROMAN: No, countries volunteer whether they want to bind their states and localities, or in the case of Canada, their provinces, and Canada did not bind their --

    Q So they're stuck?

    MR. FROMAN: We'll work with them -- we're working with them and our other trading partners to see if we can mitigate the impact on trade while implementing the law and fulfilling our international obligations.

BLOGExclusive: Is There Another Windsor Protocol


You remember the disaster and near-riot with the first Back-to-Work Protocol with CUPE.

Is there a secret Protocol signed between the Government of Canada and Eddie Francis that no one outside of Government has been let in on? Does Council know?

If there is another one, I sure hope it works out better!

Serious questions are now being raised as a result of the Three Amigos Session!

Was this Protocol the reason why it seemed that Transport Minister Baird and Conservative MP Jeff Watson were prepared to do handstands to get the City canal money even though it is clear that the canal would not meet the Infrastructure Program criteria:
  • "City of Windsor engineer Mario Sonego said road jobs like those underway in the county can usually be tendered quickly, but that the projects for which the city secured approval are more complex and require significant engineering and planning.

    He said the term "shovel ready" didn't mean projects had to be signed and sealed and sitting in blueprint form on a shelf, only that projects needed to have cleared certain environmental hurdles.

    The costs involved in the engineering phases of projects mean design work generally isn't undertaken until projects are greenlighted, he added."

Was this Protocol the reason why the Feds overpaid for Brighton Beach so that the City could pay for the Estin bills and for its share of the Government programs?

All these mysterious trips for the Mayor supposedly for Children's Games and job creation. Does the Protocol now explain the reason he was overseas? In reality, was he in Europe for several weeks during the CUPE strike, something that seems inconceivable, for national security reasons ie to check out security arrangments for meetings of world leaders. Who is the unnamed, mysterious woman he was with for part of the trip and why did he pay out his own money if a good part of it was for City business?

Why would he want to do that?

From the JOINT STATEMENT BY NORTH AMERICAN LEADERS
Guadalajara, August 2009:

  • "President Calderón and President Obama welcome Prime Minister Harper’s offer to host the next North American Leaders´ Summit in 2010. We will continue to work through this North American Leaders’ Summit process, in an inclusive and transparent manner, for the common benefit of the people of Mexico, Canada, and the United States."

If Eddie runs for the Conservatives, expect the Summit to be held in WINDSOR! After all, Muskoka got the G8 meeting. So far anyway.

I can hardly wait to see what else is in the Protocol!

The Next CUPE Strike And Other Stories



Here are some more items of interest.

BORDER LEGAL AND CONSULTANT FEES




Here they are until the end of March. Up another quarter of a million. Such perfect timing for the disclosure too.

Good thing that the City can use up $6M of the $34M we got from the Feds for Brighton Beach to pay for the BUY FOREIGN consultants who live and work more than 4-500 KMs from here.

THE CUPE STRIKE IS OVER, LONG LIVE THE NEXT CUPE STRIKE

Should CUPE start planning now? You had better believe it and so should other City Unions. They need to look back and learn their lessons as they plan for the future.

After the Protocol fiasco,
  • "Said Jim Wood, who represents outside workers: "Our people want respect, and they didn't get it today."

They did not get it on payday either. Talk about lack of respect!

Preparations have already been started at City Hall for the next strike. I know this not because of the stupidly insensitive remarks of the Councillor formerly known as Councillor Budget nor because of the right-wing claptrap from Gord and mini-Gord.

Remember the Star Editorial saying:

  • "But with their return come the questions: Where do we go from here? Will it be business as usual after a long and protracted work stoppage that virtually polarized the city? Can it ever be the same?

    Maybe not -- at least, not in the foreseeable future. As Mayor Eddie Francis said, there are wounds to be healed."

I think City Hall is healing them by rubbing the wounds with salt. The psychological warfare has just begun.

Here is a copy of a pay stub sent to me by a CUPE worker. Obviously I have deleted most of the key inforamtion so that the person cannot be identified because that person might be disciplined for daring to speak to the BLOGMEISTER.



You will notice that the worker was not "on strike" but rather on "unpaid leave." However, the key point is that the person will see on every paystub for the remainder of the year that he/she has lost about $15,000 in pay as if the person did not know that already (The actual amount is close to that amount but not exact for reasons expressed above). Oh and the signing bonus is a mere adjustment

Guess how the person feels about this new "healing" technique:

  • "I don't think I'll forget Eddie saying on the news (A channel I believe) 'Respect ... we respect our employees ... now they want to negotiate respect ... how do you put a price on respect?'

    Well one way to put a price on respect is not to rub my face in how much I lost over the strike, [expletive deleted] (and will now see this amount every two weeks until my last pay in December 2009)!!! or how about giving us the $2000, $1000 or $500 adjustment cheque by the first Friday we were back instead of making us wait the full 10 days! How about giving overtime if needed or as required to get back to normal city business as fast as possible. How about not sending in Ron Jones and Ken Lewenza Jr into the lunch room at 400 CHSE (city hall square east) a week ago to welcome us back.

    The list is endless and Eddie the [expletive deleted] just doesn't get it. He is just so wrapped up in himself. See how easy it is to get me to rant!!!"

Gosh, do you think possible mayoral candidate to be Dave Cooke will condemn this in public? After all:

  • "As Cooke said, it's time for us to move on; time to embrace a spirit of goodwill and co-operation"

TWELVE YEAR OLD GETS IT

From another reader:

  • "First, let me thank you for your honest and fair observations of the recent CUPE 82 and 543 strike. It was refreshing to read comments from a third party that admitted he wasn't always on our side. (one of your first blogs I read - 29 May 2009)

    Since I first read your blog, my wife, 12 year old daughter and I have been reading it regularly. When I came home last night my daughter wanted to show me a video she made about the strike. I cannot understand why ten adults and their so called leader could not understand our fight but a 12 year old girl could.

    She has asked me to share this video with as many people as possible. I thought you might enjoy it. Please feel free to share it if you wish.

    Again, thanks for the honest and fair support."






WILL NELSON SANTOS ANSWER MY QUESTIONS

I received a couple of emails from him repecting some recent BLOGs:

1) "Good to see you are keeping up a hectic schedule and catching up to so many issues and stories. I will have an invitation sent to you shortly re: nomination meeting--putting final touches on it this morning!

Thanks for the mention and definitely want to help answer all those questions you pose."

2) After asking him about the disclosure of WEDC income and expenditures, he wrote:

"Many answers will come as the new corporation and board members have joined.

As for compensation--the new bylaws as presented to both councils include a provision that the positions for directors are volunteer without any remuneration or stipend--the only compensation allowed will be for out of pocket expenses (Parking etc.)

Hope the weekend has been good."

This new pay-scale for Board members makes it even more urgent and important that WEDC open its books fully.

I do hope that the Warden and Mayor as our "political representatives" have the sense to do so immediately although based on past comments I am not very optimistic:

  • "I believe now is the time to look at all the books; do a forensic audit and get a look at the 2006, 2007 cheque registry," said Tecumseh Mayor Gary McNamara.

    An independent probe into the spending records of the commission was also demanded by The Windsor Association of Concerned Taxpayers -- a self-described taxpayers' watchdog.

    It is absolutely astonishing to learn that after millions of dollars were given to the development commission, their priorities have been so minimal," said Chris Schnurr, WeACT president...

    Mayor Eddie Francis and County Warden Nelson Santos as well as acting commission CEO Remo Mancini accused the agency's critics of spreading innuendo through the news media...

    Francis challenged McNamara to come forward with information that would warrant a forensic audit.

    "If he has information that is credible and leads him to believe a forensic audit is needed, I would urge him to come forward with that information. Otherwise this political attack on the development commission and creating or insinuating there are issues hurts our efforts to attract investors and jobs to our region."

I would suggest that the first thing the Warden should do at the next Board meeting is introduce a Motion to release this information to the public so as to set a new tone of openness and transparency.

If not, he has just given Jeff Watson his first issue to use to try and beat him in the next Federal election!

WILL THE AMBASSADOR BRIDGE BE ON THE THREE LEADERS' AGENDA

Here is a hint that it probably will not be:

  • "Prime Minister Stephen Harper today announced that he will meet with Mexican President Felipe Calderón and American President Barack Obama at the upcoming North American Leaders' Summit in Guadalajara, Mexico, on August 9 and 10, 2009. The Prime Minister will be joined at the summit by Minister of Public Safety Peter Van Loan and Minister of State of Foreign Affairs (Americas) Peter Kent."

Although Minister Van Loan has CBSA responsibility, one would have expected Transport Canada Minister Baird to be in attendance since this is technically his file although PM Harper is really running it!

WAS THERE A BUDGET OR WAS THERE NOT A BUDGET

City Hall so confuses me. One thing is said one time which is pretty clear then I read something subsequently that does not seem to me to square with what was said first.

Perhaps in Eddie's new Office of Communications, one person could be detailed to explain away the seeming contradictions. It would be so much easier for me that way!

Story #1

Dig it? Yes we can; City plans $300M in projects
Windsor Star 04-29-2009

Council meets May 6 to begin consideration of the recommended 2009 budget, beginning with public delegations....

The preliminary 2009 capital budget being submitted to council is $92.5 million, but administration notes there are a number of factors that could have an impact on that figure.

The preliminary budget, for example, doesn't take into account $20.6 million the city received last fall under the Provincial Investing in Ontario Act that remains untouched. And Windsor has yet to hear what its share will be from the $4-billion federal- provincial stimulus funding package announced in this year's Conservative budget.

Council had delayed debating the city's 2009 capital budget pending word on what might be coming from the senior governments, but Francis said it can't wait any longer.

"Without a doubt, that stimulus money is a necessary catalyst for projects we'd otherwise not do," he said, adding whatever the final figure is, it will "just further enhance" what Windsor is now planning on its own.

Treasurer Colucci said Windsor has been asked to submit a detailed shortlist of infrastructure projects that can be started quickly and completed by March 31, 2011. He said the city hopes to do that by May 1 and that it has been told "Ottawa will expedite it."

Colucci and Francis said exactly what makes the lists for federal money or the city's own plan is still being worked out. Pushed to give examples, however, Francis points to the $6.3-million upgrade of "beat-up" Tecumseh Road East between Jefferson and Lauzon, completion of the Wyandotte Street East corridor, the start of the Riverside Drive Vista enhancement project, replacing the College Avenue bridge and improvements to Walker and Provincial roads.

By next week, council will also be digesting a report being prepared by the mayor on pushing ahead with a proposed downtown canal project."

Story #2

Focus Ontario Interview August 1, 2009. Transcript from http://lineosight.blogspot.com/

Eddie: Absolutely. Going into this strike, into these negotiations, the city of Windsor knew exactly what our financial position was, our budget had already been struck; we had already delivered a zero percent tax increase to the residents....

Eddie: What I can tell you in Windsor is that, as I indicated, we’ve been working hard to get our financial house in order. We completed our budget, we delivered a zero percent tax increase on the average assessed home in the city of Windsor and at the beginning of the strike there are many charges against us by CUPE, by Sid Ryan, by CUPE National, suggesting that we were entering into a strike to save money for the city."

How could the Budget have been completed when it was not finalized by May 6 and the strike started on April 15.

FINANCIAL HOUSE IN ORDER

A reader sent me this photo of the City's Tax Statement of Account. "Taxes levied" seem to have gone up every year, except for 2004, and increased in 2009. The biggest increase was in 2009, the year we had a "zero percent tax increase." I guess this home was not "average."


Sunday, August 9, 2009

Huge Canada/US Diplomatic Storm Brewing



It should hardly be a surprise. I warned Prime Minister Harper so many times that his Ambassador to the US, Michael Wilson, was ruining Canada/US relations with his ridiculous strategy. I suggested that Wilson should "graciously" resign after NAFTA-gate or be forced out.

Now it appears that Michael Wilson was not acting on his own. The Chair of the Board of Canwest was also contributing his 2 cents worth. (Interestingly, that is also how much I was prepared to offer Canwest to buy the Star because of Canwest's huge financial mess!) No wonder the border file is such a disaster.
  • "Derek Burney, a former Canadian ambassador to Washington, said the trilateral talks in and of themselves haven't generated much in the way of substance over the years.

    “When you get into a trilateral setting you're dealing with low-common-denominator commonality and you're evading some of the harder bilateral issues that need to be addressed.”

Yup, make the Mexicans angry just as the US is trying to help them out! And rub it in with new visa requirments just before the Three Leaders Summit too. Such perfect timing against our major competitor for auto jobs and plants.

It is too late now for them. Clearly, the Canada desk in the State Department in Washington is a close and avid reader of this BLOG. They have learned how Canada is trying to fool them. They have learned what the Ambassador Bridge fight is all about and how it can be used as the next softwood lumber case.

Oh and if you do not think that the Obama White House has not figured out how to stir up Congress to impose more anti-protectionist measures and not to remove the ones that are upsetting our Premiers, just wait until they discuss how Canada is trying to control the US border access points if things get nasty! Perhaps Stephen can threaten Obama with oil and energy as he tried with President Bush and see how far that gets him and us.

So someone had this neat idea how to show Harper that he did not count any more:

GLOBE AND MAIL

  • "Unlike Mexico, Canada won't even get a one-on-one meeting with Mr. Obama during the Guadalajara summit. Mr. Harper will have to wait until Sept. 16 for a tête-à-tête at the White House...

    But Canadian officials already appear to be looking to the Sept. 16 meeting between Mr. Harper and Mr. Obama as more important than the Guadalajara summit for addressing pressing issues. The Prime Minister's Office made a point of announcing the September White House get-together during a press briefing yesterday on the North American Leader's Summit."

You got it. Obama snubbed Harper...to his face. Thus the need for damage control from the PM's PR team. I'll talk about September in a minute.

Here's more:

TORONTO STAR

  • "PM won't meet with Obama one-on-one at summit in Mexico...

    Harper, who unlike Mexican president Calderon is not scheduled to have a one-on-one chat with Obama in Guadalajara, has instead accepted an invitation to see the U.S. president in Washington, D.C., on Sept. 16."

HOUSTON CHRONICLE

  • "It's a heavy load, but the first fellas have given themselves a short workday's worth of face time to clear the in-box.

    “It isn't a time where you have these long philosophical talks over tequila,” analyst Shannon O'Neil says. “I don't think it's a creative process or meant to be one.”

    Instead, there will be short back-to-back one-on-ones Sunday evening — first Mexico's Felipe Calderon and Canada's Stephen Harper, then Mexico's leader and Obama. It's mostly high cotton between everyone these days, but a few weeds do persist."

Now that is really spelling it out in the boldest terms possible.

No Harper/Obama session. No face-time together. No serious talking about how to take over the Ambassador Bridge, again. What an insult to Canada, what a slap in the face to Harper. What a lesson to be taught to Canada! Mexico is more important than Canada, theri biggest trading partner.

Oh but you say, Harper has been invited for a one-on-one with Obama in September. Everything must be fine between our two countries. Harper can make his anti-Ambassador Bridge pitch then .

Hardly and here is where the huge faux pas came in.

I will bet that the White House asked the Canadian Embassy in DC to arrange a visit by the Canadian Head of State to come to DC. Remember when Obama was in Ottawa in February, we learned:

  • "Obama invites Michaëlle Jean to Washington

    Governor General Michaëlle Jean discussed the plight of her native Haiti with U.S. President Barack Obama, who invited her to come to Washington – an invitation that was not extended to Prime Minister Stephen Harper.

    American aides to the president who briefed the travelling White House reporters en route back to Washington Thursday said Obama and the Governor General exchanged "views about how we could be helpful to the government there in dealing with economic and social issues..."

    "President Obama told (Jean) that he'd like to talk further with her on this issue," said Marthe Blouin, an aide to the Governor General.

    Obama told Jean he wants to return to Canada with his family. "He told her he would like to see her again," Blouin said.

    "And he said to her that he would love to see her in Washington as well...

    It was clear Canada's first black governor general and Obama, the first black American president, hit it off. They beamed as they strode down a red carpet together.

    At one point, cameras captured Jean tossing back her head in laughter. "At that moment she was telling him that she felt it was like a love affair between him and Canadians," Blouin said later."


She is technically the Head of State but the Canadian Embassy mistakenly thought the President meant Harper as the political Head (or perhaps they knew but had to save face for Stephen again if there is a fall election). Stephen quickly accepted the invitation.

Obama must have been outraged. It was too late then for the President to say that Harper was not the invitee but that it was the Governor General whom he wished to see again! He was stuck.

It was worse than NAFTA-gate could ever be. Instead of Jean, he got Harper! Spending time with Stephen in Mexico was NOT going to happen.

Watch for a mini-crisis with Iran or North Korea around that time in Septemeber and the unfortunate cancellation of the Harper visit.

Friday, August 7, 2009

Questions, Questions, Questions

Who will provide the answers and when

WHAT ARE THE UNDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION INCOME AND EXPENSES

Will we ever see a statement about how much the WEDC received in revenue and from whom and how much it spent? In particular, how much was spent in domestic and foreign travel and by whom over the last several years. What concrete results were achieved by the travel?

I would have thought this information should be readily available by now for the new Board and to the public. After all, there is nothing to hide is there. We do not need a forensic accounting do we.

Speaking of the Board how does Eddie get to sit on it given the Council Resolution saying he can only be a member for a few months. Was something passed in camera to change that?

And by the way, don't you find it surprising that his appointment was not made publicly? I heard he initially wanted a private person on the Board but when Bill Marra's name was put forward, since there was a view expressed that a City politician should be a Board member, Eddie put his name forward too. Eddie won 6-5 in the vote. Given the closeness, who voted for and against?

Will Eddie now receive a Board fee if he is a permanent Board member?

Given his run for federal office if he should be nominated, should Warden Santos resign from the Baord?

WHEN ARE THE INVESTIGATION RESULTS TO BE RELEASED

Gee, how long does it take for the internal report and for the Integrity Commissioner's report on the infamous leak during the strike to be released? Earl Basse received the complaint in mid-June!

If he has reported already, when did he do so and where is the Report for the public to review? If it was management, could this be considered proof of bad faith negotiating that prolonged the strike to the financial detriment of CUPE workers?

I am pretty sure I can guess who leaked it from a Star photo I saw but I would like official confirmation.

And by the way, has anyone ever asked how Councillor Marra's "New Beginnings" program made it into Eddie's Back To Work Protocol and why? Bill was not told about it in advance it seems from his email especially since Bill claimed it was irrelevant to the strike.

ARE DWIGHT AND EDDIE GOOD FRIENDS NOW

Clearly they have to be. It is not too early to be thinking about possible runs for federal seats and re-elections as Mayor and as MPP.

With the sale of Brighton Beach and the DRIC Road supposedly moving forward, Greenlink has to be put to death or rather, some great compromise has to be reached so Eddie can save face!

Will Bill Marra's ambition to be Mayor be sacrificed again in the name of power politics?

WHERE WILL GORD ORR GO

I ask this because:
  • "Current managing director of the visitors bureau, Gordon Orr, a 14-year city employee, has been at the helm since February 2003. He has decided to remain a city employee and not apply for the tourism top job. He expects to be reassigned to a new position within a few months after overseeing the transition of a new CEO."

I wonder if he will join the CAO's Group. Councillor Halberstadt in his BLOG recently wrote:

  • "With all of the talk about scaling back the municipal workforce in the wake of the CUPE strike, I cannot resist dusting off a blog I posted about a month before the walkout. Before reading it again, you should be advised that all of these new positions (up to seven) to serve out of the CAO's office will be non-union personnel...

    I have a hard time believing that the mayor and upper administration will have the gonads to go ahead and actually hire these individuals."

He was referring to this:

  • "Windsor property taxpayers can be forgiven for shaking their heads in disbelief when they learn that City Council has earmarked $570,000 to hire a battery of new full-time equivalent positions under the auspices of the CAO's office.

    It remains unclear how many FTE positions will be created in CAO John Socorobohacz's office in the midst of a job-loss tsunami cresting across the rest of the community, but it could be up to seven...

    The concept of a Corporate Communications Office has been a political footbal for two years...

    The cynical view is that this office will be populated by spin doctors spewing propaganda.

    One passage in the Service Delivery Review charter on this project indicates the latter might be the case, at least in part. It enunciates that one of the roles of the office will be "damage control."

Gord is a good Communicator after all. He and the Mayor's wife, Michelle Prince, do Movie Reviews on CKLW as just one example.

WHY DO WE NEED A CANAL

There goes Councillor Hatfiled grandstanding again, this time for a real grandstand:

  • "With Amanda's success and Windsor Mayor Eddie Francis lobbying to host the International Children's Games, the idea of building a 50-metre pool here has been raised again. The city and county could lobby governments for money for a pool for the region, on the edge of South Windsor, minutes from Tecumseh, Essex and LaSalle, says city Coun. Percy Hatfield."

For sure, keep it away from downtown. We cannot have people attracted to the West End Super anchor site can we, say tied in with an Aquarium!


Instead of trying to save a buck by removing PRBs from newly elected Councillors (but NOT from himself and his colleagues), he should be advocating building a series of Geodesic Domes over the canal, part of which could be used for a pool!

I am certain that Minister Baird and MP Jeff Watson could find the money for that too especially if they are trying to save Jeff from being defeated by Warden Nelson Santos in the next Federal election. They found $34M for Eddie already. What's a few bucks more?

WHO ELSE IS RUNNING FOR THE LIBERALS

Some one seems to know the result in advance. I guess the answer must be no one since it looks like Nelson will be acclaimed:

  • "Nelson Santos Nomination Meeting will be Friday August 14th around 7-7:30 PM possibly at the [name of location] in Kingsville - not confirmed yet. They're asking for the President, Executives & family, friends of the [Name of riding] Fed. And Prov. ridings to be invited. They will be sending the invitations later."

WILL DALTON FINALLY GIVE US THE POWER OF RECALL OF MUNICIPAL POLITICIANS

Just imagine how active people would be in local politics then. The threat of recall itself would keep politicians on the straight and narrow.

Just look at the Ward Boundary Review fiasco where a Petition of only a few hundred Windsorites has scared the heck out of our Council:

  • "This is obviously a difficult issue for some members of council to deal with because reshaping the city electoral map could not only increase workload, but could also make re-election more difficult.

    That's likely part of the reason councillors were unable to come to an agreement on a revised ward system a month ago.

    They looked at everything from 10 wards to 8 wards and two fewer councillors. After a dozen failed motions and a three-hour debate, council essentially gave up.

    But public pressure resulted in a motion to reconsider a new ward system, and that will lead to a discussion -- and hopefully a decision -- Monday."

WILL THE BROOKINGS REPORT EVER BE REPORTED CORRECTLY

I doubt it. It destroys the DRIC bridge project since it says that spending billions cannot be justified since traffic has dropped so much.

The distortion of facts on the reporting of their Report has bothered me. I cannot believe how sloppy the media is by continuing to report something that is factually wrong.

I suspect thought that I know who has caused the sloppiness and why ie not disclosing to reporters a key section of the report.

I saw that Jim Lyons of the Windsor Construction Association gave an interview recently on the border file and sent him this note with a copy to his Board:

  • "Jim,

    I saw the comments in the Daily Commercial News. http://dcnonl.com/article/id34828 "Windsor, Ontario awaits crossing jobs boom"

    I do not know if you told the publication about or if they had the information themselves already about the Brookings Report. That report in fact said that the Ambassador Bridge's new bridge would be built first and questioned the need for spending billions on a DRIC bridge since traffic has decreased so much. In other words, the story's comment was completely incorrect. It is the need for the DRIC bridge that is being questioned

    In addition, the proposed DRIC road can be routed directly to the Ambassador Bridge to avoid "current-access thoroughfares" and access to the Ambassador Bridge accordingly would NOT need any "careful planning regarding traffic access through Windsor."

    Please help to stop the spread of disinformation to members of the Construction industry. As you know, the consequences can be serious for them if they do not know the facts."

HAS THE AMBASSADOR BRIDGE COMPANY HAD ENOUGH

You better believe it.

I have no intention of making a comment about the dispute between the Bridge Company and Councillor Jones since the Star story does not set out the specific matters in issue although it has to do with the homes on Indian Road.

I expect that not only will

  • "The Ambassador Bridge company [fire] a warning shot across the bow... threatening legal action if [anyone] persists in spreading what the company alleges is misinformation about its practices and intentions regarding [the border file]"

but will actually start suing regardless where the Party is located and regardless who the Party is.

It will be interesting to see if someone will have the nerve to test them now.

WILL THE TORONTO MEDIA DO A CORRECTION

Remember how they gushed over Eddie and his brilliant plans to handle garbage during our strike? They accepted at face value about the 75-80% of garbage that he said was being dealt with.

Why then are they not reporting this:

  • "Trash pickup still behind, but no OT

    City officials are holding firm to a pledge not to pay overtime following the 15-week municipal strike, although trash collection is still running about two days behind.

    “Council has determined that the best way to proceed is to get garbage collection back on track, but not to pay out any strike related overtime to accomplish that goal,” Ward 1 Coun. Dave Brister said Thursday evening.

    “A number of councillors, myself included, heard from residents throughout the strike who said, do not pay overtime to complete the work that wasn’t done during the strike.”

Wait, if there is garbage still not picked up, do not blame Eddie:

  • BLAME COUNCILLOR BRISTER

Wait, we cannot blame the Mayor and Council or even the Councillor. You see, Eddie's plan worked completely. It is just that Windsorites are so wasteful and so not concerend with the environment that we have produced tons of new garbage since the strike is over and that has caused the problem. Accordingly,

  • BLAME WINDSORITES